Scheurer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scheurer v. State

396 So. 2d 194, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17607

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1980

DocketNo. 79-2027

StatusPublished

This text of 396 So. 2d 194 (Scheurer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheurer v. State, 396 So. 2d 194, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in imposing a two year term in prison as a special condition to appellant’s five year term of probation for grand theft and also claims error in the denial of his motion for new trial.

We find no error in the denial of the motion for new trial. However, the Supreme Court has recently held that an order of incarceration for one year or more imposed as a condition of probation is illegal. Villery v. The Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (1980). Also see Russell v. State, 386 So.2d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The two year term involved herein is clearly illegal under Villery.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed but the order of probation is reversed with directions for further proceedings in accord with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Villery, supra.

BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI