Scheuerman v. Green

Fourth Circuit

Scheuerman v. Green

415 F. App'x 448

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2011·No. No. 10-6933·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Scheuerman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scheuer-man v. Green, No. 8:10-cv-00674-DKC, 2010 WL 2595952 (D. Md. filed June 22, 2010 & entered June 23, 2010). We deny Scheuerman’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Scheuerman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scheuer-man v. Green, No. 8:10-cv-00674-DKC, 2010 WL 2595952 (D. Md. filed June 22, 2010 & entered June 23, 2010). We deny Scheuerman’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scheuerman v. Green, 415 F. App'x 448 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

415 F. App'x 448 (Scheuerman v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.