Scheuer v. Rosenbaum

32 Misc. 750, 65 N.Y.S. 664
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 750 (Scheuer v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheuer v. Rosenbaum, 32 Misc. 750, 65 N.Y.S. 664 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Conlan, J.

The simple question before us on this appeal was whether or not certain goods ordered by the defendants from the plaintiffs were delivered.or tendered in time.

Upon this question, the evidence upon the trial was in conflict, and the charge of the trial justice, to which there was no exception, clearly stated the whole case to the jury. In addition to this, the defendants, at the close of all the testimony, asked the court to submit to the jury this precise, question of delivery, and the court acquiesced. The jury determined the whole matter in favor of the plaintiffs, and we have no inclination to disturb their finding

Judgment and order appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 750, 65 N.Y.S. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheuer-v-rosenbaum-nynyccityct-1900.