Schesny v. State
This text of 575 So. 2d 654 (Schesny v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Daniel Edward Schesny petitions this Court to review Schesny v. State, 564 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal affirmed Schesny’s probationary split sentence. The district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES OF SECTION 921.187, FLORIDA STATUTES?
Id. at 640-41.1 In Glass v. State, 574 So.2d 1099, 1101 (Fla.1991), we rephrased an identical question to read:
IS THERE STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION FOR A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE?
We answered the rephrased question in the affirmative.
[655]*655In accordance with our decision in Glass, we approve the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in this case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 So. 2d 654, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 195, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 356, 1991 WL 25372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schesny-v-state-fla-1991.