Scherrer v. United States

2008 DNH 092
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided April 28, 2008·No. 08-CV-002-SM·Published

Opinion

Scherrer v . United States 08-CV-002-SM 04/28/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Phillip S . Scherrer

v. Civil N o . 08-cv-2-SM Opinion N o . 2008 DNH 092 United States of America

O R D E R

Petitioner seeks relief from his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming, among other things, that his defense counsel provided ineffective assistance and that his guilty plea was not competently offered because, at the time, he was suffering from an overdose of a number of prescription drugs administered at the jail in which he was being detained. Essentially, petitioner asserts that he was not capable of understanding the nature of the plea proceedings, or of meaningfully participating in those proceedings, or communicating effectively with his counsel. Petitioner also says that counsel had no basis upon which to assure the court that he was capable of understanding the nature of the proceedings, and, indeed, claims that he was not only incapable of competently participating in the plea colloquy, but was also incompetent during plea negotiations, and had no understanding of the terms of the resulting negotiated agreement.

Having reviewed the petition, exhibits, and record, it is apparent that a hearing is required as petitioner’s allegations, if true, would entitle him to relief. Petitioner has submitted medical records, albeit seemingly incomplete, that facially support his claim that he was taking several prescription medications, and the court cannot, based on the record as it stands, find that his improvident plea claims are “so evanescent or bereft of detail that they cannot reasonably be investigated,” or that they amount to “threadbare allusions.” David v. United States, 134 F.3d 470, 478 (1st Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, the clerk shall appoint counsel to represent the petitioner and schedule a hearing on the petition.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. __McAuliffe

Chief Judge

April 28, 2008

cc: Phillip S. Scherrer, pro se Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, AUSA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scherrer v. United States, 2008 DNH 092 (D.N.H. 2008).

2008 DNH 092 (Scherrer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

David v. United States
134 F.3d 470 (First Circuit, 1998)