Scherrer v. United States
This text of 2008 DNH 092 (Scherrer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Scherrer v . United States 08-CV-002-SM 04/28/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Phillip S . Scherrer
v. Civil N o . 08-cv-2-SM Opinion N o . 2008 DNH 092 United States of America
O R D E R
Petitioner seeks relief from his conviction and sentence
under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming, among other things, that his
defense counsel provided ineffective assistance and that his
guilty plea was not competently offered because, at the time, he
was suffering from an overdose of a number of prescription drugs
administered at the jail in which he was being detained.
Essentially, petitioner asserts that he was not capable of
understanding the nature of the plea proceedings, or of
meaningfully participating in those proceedings, or communicating
effectively with his counsel. Petitioner also says that counsel
had no basis upon which to assure the court that he was capable
of understanding the nature of the proceedings, and, indeed,
claims that he was not only incapable of competently
participating in the plea colloquy, but was also incompetent
during plea negotiations, and had no understanding of the terms
of the resulting negotiated agreement. Having reviewed the petition, exhibits, and record, it is
apparent that a hearing is required as petitioner’s allegations,
if true, would entitle him to relief. Petitioner has submitted
medical records, albeit seemingly incomplete, that facially
support his claim that he was taking several prescription
medications, and the court cannot, based on the record as it
stands, find that his improvident plea claims are “so evanescent
or bereft of detail that they cannot reasonably be investigated,”
or that they amount to “threadbare allusions.” David v. United
States, 134 F.3d 470, 478 (1st Cir. 1998).
Accordingly, the clerk shall appoint counsel to represent
the petitioner and schedule a hearing on the petition.
SO ORDERED.
Steven J. __McAuliffe Chief Judge
April 28, 2008
cc: Phillip S. Scherrer, pro se Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, AUSA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 DNH 092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scherrer-v-united-states-nhd-2008.