Scherrer v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Scherrer v. Southern Pacific Co.

183 P. 250, 41 Cal. App. 793, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 496

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 18, 1919

DocketCiv. No. 2637.

StatusPublished

This text of 183 P. 250 (Scherrer v. Southern Pacific Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scherrer v. Southern Pacific Co., 183 P. 250, 41 Cal. App. 793, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 496 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for new trial.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for the death of Leontine Scherrer, his wife, which he alleged was caused through the negligent acts of defendant. The wife was riding in an automobile which was struck by moving cars on a track of the defendant railway company, by reason of which collision she suffered injuries which caused her death. [1] The questions argued in the briefs in this case are the same as those presented in McClure v. Southern Pacific Co., ante, p. 652, [183 P. 248], which was an action for damages growing out of the same accident. It will be unnecessary to here repeat the discussion of those questions, and upon the authority of the conclusions expressed in the McClure case, the judgment and order herein appealed from are affirmed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for new trial.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for the death of Leontine Scherrer, his wife, which he alleged was caused through the negligent acts of defendant. The wife was riding in an automobile which was struck by moving cars on a track of the defendant railway company, by reason of which collision she suffered injuries which caused her death. [1] The questions argued in the briefs in this case are the same as those presented in McClure v. Southern Pacific Co., ante, p. 652, [183 P. 248], which was an action for damages growing out of the same accident. It will be unnecessary to here repeat the discussion of those questions, and upon the authority of the conclusions expressed in the McClure case, the judgment and order herein appealed from are affirmed.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 P. 250, 41 Cal. App. 793, 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scherrer-v-southern-pacific-co-calctapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack