Scherr v. Andrews

497 So. 2d 970, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2419, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10686
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1986·No. No. 86-1157·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where a protective order of the trial court has temporarily precluded the plaintiffs from deposing one of two defendants and the effect of such order is to deprive the plaintiffs of the opportunity to discover information tending to establish the liability of the co-defendant, the entry of a summary judgment for the co-defendant while the protective order is in effect is premature. The summary judgment is, accordingly, reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, which may, of course, include a renewed motion for summary judgment after the plaintiffs have had a full and fair opportunity for discovery.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scherr v. Andrews, 497 So. 2d 970, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2419, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

497 So. 2d 970 (Scherr v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erace v. Erace
683 So. 2d 1114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Lenhal Realty, Inc. v. Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp.
615 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)