Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh

New York Supreme Court

Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh

7 Cow. 519

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 Cow. 519 (Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schermerhorn v. Van Valkenburgh, 7 Cow. 519 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The order to stay proceedings on the part of the plaintiff would not, per se, suspend the running of the rule to rejoin; the time allowed by which expired with the 15th of August. The order to stay, therefore, having ceased to operate before the 20th, the default of that'day was regular. And we can only interfere and set it aside on terms, which are payment of the costs.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The order to stay proceedings on the part of the plaintiff would not, per se, suspend the running of the rule to rejoin; the time allowed by which expired with the 15th of August. The order to stay, therefore, having ceased to operate before the 20th, the default of that'day was regular. And we can only interfere and set it aside on terms, which are payment of the costs.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cow. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schermerhorn-v-van-valkenburgh-nysupct-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack