Schermerhorn v. Miller

2 Cow. 439
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Cow. 439 (Schermerhorn v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schermerhorn v. Miller, 2 Cow. 439 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

Curia.

This application is warranted by the 14th section for the act for the partition of lands. (1 R. L. 513.) By the iparriage and birth of the chile}, Miller became tepant by the curtesy initiate ; and by the sale upon the execution, Given succeeded to his rights, and would he entitled, under the statute of partition, to the interest during Miller’s life; hut the period for redernp.tion has no) expired, gnd we cannot grant the rule as applied for. Let one-third of the proceeds of the sale by the cp.rnniissip.ners be paid to the Clerk and he put at interest, which we will dispose of, on further application, when the period for redemption has expired, according to the rights of the parties at that time.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re McKenna
9 F. 27 (W.D. Tennessee, 1881)
In re Winne
1 Lans. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cow. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schermerhorn-v-miller-nysupct-1824.