Schermerhorn v. . Anderson

New York Court of Appeals

Schermerhorn v. . Anderson

1 N.Y. 430

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 5, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 N.Y. 430 (Schermerhorn v. . Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schermerhorn v. . Anderson, 1 N.Y. 430 (N.Y. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion must be granted absolutely, so far as the appeal'relates to the decree made at the special term, on the ground that no appeal lies from the special term. The appeal being from two orders, the undertaking is not large enough, and the motion must therefore be granted also as to the appeal from the order of the general term, unless the appel lant amend the undertaking by striking out so much as relates to the order of the special term, and pay the costs of the appeal from that order, and of this motion.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion must be granted absolutely, so far as the appeal'relates to the decree made at the special term, on the ground that no appeal lies from the special term. The appeal being from two orders, the undertaking is not large enough, and the motion must therefore be granted also as to the appeal from the order of the general term, unless the appel lant amend the undertaking by striking out so much as relates to the order of the special term, and pay the costs of the appeal from that order, and of this motion.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schermerhorn-v-anderson-ny-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack