Scherl v. Borchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scherl v. Borchard

12 A.D.2d 909, 212 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1961·Published

Opinion

Judgment entered in plaintiffs’ favor after trial, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to the appellant, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs. The testimony and the exhibits compel a finding that the $4,000 payment made by the wife was for all legal services rendered to her, including the services payment for which is here sought. Accordingly, we so find, substituting this finding for the contrary one made by the trial court. [910]*910Settle order on notice. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [22 Misc 2d 65-7.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered in plaintiffs’ favor after trial, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to the appellant, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint, with costs. The testimony and the exhibits compel a finding that the $4,000 payment made by the wife was for all legal services rendered to her, including the services payment for which is here sought. Accordingly, we so find, substituting this finding for the contrary one made by the trial court. [910]*910Settle order on notice. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [22 Misc 2d 65-7.]

Scherl v. Borchard, 12 A.D.2d 909, 212 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

12 A.D.2d 909 (Scherl v. Borchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related