Schering Corp. v. Perrigo Co.

Federal Circuit

Schering Corp. v. Perrigo Co.

83 F. App'x 319

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedNovember 20, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1029

StatusPublished

This text of 83 F. App'x 319 (Schering Corp. v. Perrigo Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schering Corp. v. Perrigo Co., 83 F. App'x 319 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Perrigo Company and L. Perrigo Company move to lift the stay of the briefing schedule in 03-1029 and enter judgment, based on our recent decision in Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, 02-1540 et al., and to consolidate this case with those previously decided appeals. Perrigo states that Schering Corporation does not oppose.

Perrigo’s motions to lift the stay and enter judgment are proper, based on the earlier disposition. However, we note that the mandate has issued in the previously decided appeals, 02-1540 et al. Thus, consolidation with those appeals is inappropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

[320]*320(1) The motion to enter judgment is granted. The district court’s judgment is affirmed.

(2) The motion to consolidate is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI