Schepperly v. Cold Spring Construction Co.
106 A.D.2d 918, 483 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21843
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1984
StatusPublished
This text of 106 A.D.2d 918 (Schepperly v. Cold Spring Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schepperly v. Cold Spring Construction Co., 106 A.D.2d 918, 483 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in memorandum decision [919]*919at Special Term, Doyle, J. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — increase ad damnum clause.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.2d 918, 483 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schepperly-v-cold-spring-construction-co-nyappdiv-1984.