Schepp v. School Board of Broward County

506 So. 2d 1108, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1987·No. No. 4-86-0359·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the school board should not have considered any findings of misconduct associated with Counts I and III of the administrative charges brought against him because he was found to be innocent of the charges set out in those counts and he was never given proper notice of the alleged lesser misconduct found by the hearing officer. We find, however, substantial competent evidence and no procedural irregularity with reference to the remaining charges and findings of the hearing officer or the board’s approval thereof.

Accordingly, we remand this cause to the school board with directions that disciplinary action against the appellant be reconsidered without reference to the alleged misconduct associated with Counts I and III.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schepp v. School Board of Broward County, 506 So. 2d 1108, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1172, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

506 So. 2d 1108 (Schepp v. School Board of Broward County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Werner v. STATE, DEPT. OF INS.
689 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cottrill v. Department of Ins.
685 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Department of Business Regulation v. Phelps
34 Fla. Supp. 2d 214 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1988)