Scheno Trucking Co., Inc. v. Bickford

174 A. 548, 116 N.J. Eq. 586, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 717
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1934·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We discern in chapter 279 of the laws of 1931 (P. L. 1931 p. 704), which, inter alia, amended section 23 (f) of the Workmen’s Compensation act (P. L. 1911 p. 134; P. L. 1919 pp. 201, 211), a legislative purpose to grant to the employer’s insurer the right of reimbursement for compensation paid to the injured employe, under the provisions of the Compensation act, where a third party is liable for the injuries so suffered by the employe, and recovery from the tort feasor is effected. It results that the decree should be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Vah Buskirk, Hays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Donges, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scheno Trucking Co., Inc. v. Bickford, 174 A. 548, 116 N.J. Eq. 586, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 717 (N.J. 1934).

174 A. 548 (Scheno Trucking Co., Inc. v. Bickford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danesi v. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.
459 A.2d 686 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Bello v. Commissioner of Dept. of Labor
246 A.2d 759 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Orth v. Shiely Petter Crushed Stone Co.
91 N.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Prudential Insurance Co. v. Laval
23 A.2d 908 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)