Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Martini & Rossi Corp.
538 N.E.2d 352, 73 N.Y.2d 987, 540 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 454
This text of 538 N.E.2d 352 (Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Martini & Rossi Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Martini & Rossi Corp., 538 N.E.2d 352, 73 N.Y.2d 987, 540 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 454 (N.Y. 1989).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the dismissal of the third-party complaint against Meshulam Riklis denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
538 N.E.2d 352, 73 N.Y.2d 987, 540 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenley-industries-inc-v-martini-rossi-corp-ny-1989.