Schenley Import Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 325
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 26, 1960
DocketNo. 63741; protests 899711-G, etc. (Los Angeles, Indianapolis, and San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 325 (Schenley Import Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schenley Import Corp. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 325 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

[326]*326Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenley-import-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1960.