Schenley Import Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schenley Import Corp. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 279

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schenley Import Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 37 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 3, 1955·No. No. 58754; protests 943471-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grenadine the same in all material respects as that the subject of La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 44, C. A. D. 461), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schenley Import Corp. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 279 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 279 (Schenley Import Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.