Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson

333 U.S. 878, 68 S. Ct. 914, 92 L. Ed. 1154, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2264
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 26, 1948·No. No. 719·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The parties being in agreement that the cause is moot, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson, 333 U.S. 878, 68 S. Ct. 914, 92 L. Ed. 1154, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2264 (1948).

333 U.S. 878 (Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Louisiana
884 F.3d 546 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
State v. LAEDA
201 P.3d 607 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2007)
DeFunis v. Odegaard
529 P.2d 438 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Dioguardi
361 F. Supp. 954 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Reed v. Reincke
236 A.2d 909 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)
State v. Pikul
187 A.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1962)
Carl Braden v. United States
272 F.2d 653 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Acheson v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Hickman v. City of Mobile
53 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
United States v. Wilfong
95 F. Supp. 897 (W.D. Michigan, 1951)
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)