Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson

333 U.S. 878, 68 S. Ct. 914, 92 L. Ed. 1154, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2264
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 26, 1948
DocketNo. 719
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 333 U.S. 878 (Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson, 333 U.S. 878, 68 S. Ct. 914, 92 L. Ed. 1154, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2264 (1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The parties being in agreement that the cause is moot, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Louisiana
884 F.3d 546 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
State v. LAEDA
201 P.3d 607 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2007)
DeFunis v. Odegaard
529 P.2d 438 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Dioguardi
361 F. Supp. 954 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Reed v. Reincke
236 A.2d 909 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1967)
State v. Pikul
187 A.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1962)
Carl Braden v. United States
272 F.2d 653 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Acheson v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Hickman v. City of Mobile
53 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
United States v. Wilfong
95 F. Supp. 897 (W.D. Michigan, 1951)
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 U.S. 878, 68 S. Ct. 914, 92 L. Ed. 1154, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenley-distilling-corp-v-anderson-scotus-1948.