Schenkelberger v. Angelone
This text of 6 F. App'x 199 (Schenkelberger v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gordon R. Schenkelberger appeals the district court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000), as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and Schenkelberger’s informal appellate brief. Because Schenkelberger failed to challenge on appeal the basis for the district court’s ruling, he has not preserved any issue for our review. 4th Cir.R. 34(b). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Schenkelberger v. Angelone, No. CA-00-1125AM (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 11, 2000; entered Oct. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenkelberger-v-angelone-ca4-2001.