Schenkel v. Lischinsky
94 N.Y.S. 1162
Opinion
The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schenkel v. Lischinsky, 94 N.Y.S. 1162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
94 N.Y.S. 1162 (Schenkel v. Lischinsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weinberg v. Greenberger
47 Misc. 117 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)