Schenkel v. Lischinsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schenkel v. Lischinsky

94 N.Y.S. 1162

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1162 (Schenkel v. Lischinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenkel v. Lischinsky, 94 N.Y.S. 1162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenkel-v-lischinsky-nyappterm-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack