Schenke v. Rowell

1 Abb. N. Cas. 295
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedNovember 15, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Abb. N. Cas. 295 (Schenke v. Rowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schenke v. Rowell, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Opinion

Van Brunt, J.

J.,—Without passing upon the other objections to the bond, held that the first was sufficient, and ordered that the bond be set aside as irregular, defective, and insufficient, with ten dollars costs to abide the event, and with leave to plaintiff’s attorney to file a new bond within five days.

, No appeal was taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Abb. N. Cas. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenke-v-rowell-nyctcompl-1876.