Schenkberg v. Treadwell
This text of 94 N.Y.S. 418 (Schenkberg v. Treadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This judgment should be affirmed, with costs. See Bartholomae et al., Ex’rs, v. Kaufman, 47 N. Y. Super. Ct. 552, affirmed in 91 N. Y. 654 (see, for opinion, 16 N. Y. Wkly. Dig. 127); Thistle v. Jones, 45 Misc. Rep. 215, 92 N. Y. Supp. 113; Nelligan v. Campbell, 47 N. Y. St. Rep. 576, 20 N. Y. Supp. 234; Dickson’s Ex’r v. Thomas, 97 Pa. 286; Behrens v Insurance Co., 64 Iowa, 22, 19 N. W. 838.
8Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.Y.S. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenkberg-v-treadwell-nyappterm-1905.