Schenkberg v. Treadwell

94 N.Y.S. 418

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 418 (Schenkberg v. Treadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schenkberg v. Treadwell, 94 N.Y.S. 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This judgment should be affirmed, with costs. See Bartholomae et al., Ex’rs, v. Kaufman, 47 N. Y. Super. Ct. 552, affirmed in 91 N. Y. 654 (see, for opinion, 16 N. Y. Wkly. Dig. 127); Thistle v. Jones, 45 Misc. Rep. 215, 92 N. Y. Supp. 113; Nelligan v. Campbell, 47 N. Y. St. Rep. 576, 20 N. Y. Supp. 234; Dickson’s Ex’r v. Thomas, 97 Pa. 286; Behrens v Insurance Co., 64 Iowa, 22, 19 N. W. 838.

8Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartholomae v. . Kaufmann
91 N.Y. 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Henricus v. . Englert
33 N.E. 550 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Briggs v. . Partridge
64 N.Y. 357 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Nelligan v. Campbell
20 N.Y.S. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Thistle v. Jones
45 Misc. 215 (New York County Courts, 1904)
Behrens v. Germania Fire Ins.
19 N.W. 838 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.Y.S. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenkberg-v-treadwell-nyappterm-1905.