Schenk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Schenk v. State

57 S.W.2d 1118, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 742

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 8, 1933

DocketNo. 15896

StatusPublished

This text of 57 S.W.2d 1118 (Schenk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenk v. State, 57 S.W.2d 1118, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 742 (Tex. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out.

There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can demand attention, in the absence of the statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The indictment is regular. The record is before us without statement of facts and bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out.

There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can demand attention, in the absence of the statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 S.W.2d 1118, 1933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenk-v-state-texcrimapp-1933.