Schenk v. Schenk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schenk v. Schenk

8 A.D.2d 847, 190 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 847 (Schenk v. Schenk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenk v. Schenk, 8 A.D.2d 847, 190 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a wife for a separation, her husband appeals (1) from a judgment entered after trial granting a separation, and directing him to pay her $25 a week for her support and maintenance, and $200 as additional counsel fees, and (2) from so much of an order as granted her motion to modify an order of sequestration so as to authorize her, as receiver in sequestration, to withdraw any such sums of money as may be necessary to cure any future default in payment of alimony and counsel fees, and as denied his cross motion to vacate said order of sequestration. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, and order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a wife for a separation, her husband appeals (1) from a judgment entered after trial granting a separation, and directing him to pay her $25 a week for her support and maintenance, and $200 as additional counsel fees, and (2) from so much of an order as granted her motion to modify an order of sequestration so as to authorize her, as receiver in sequestration, to withdraw any such sums of money as may be necessary to cure any future default in payment of alimony and counsel fees, and as denied his cross motion to vacate said order of sequestration. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, and order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 847, 190 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenk-v-schenk-nyappdiv-1959.