SCHENK, BONCHER & PRASHER v. Vanderlaan
This text of 688 N.W.2d 499 (SCHENK, BONCHER & PRASHER v. Vanderlaan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCHENK, BONCHER & PRASHER
v.
VANDERLAAN.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 125181, COA: 237690.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2003 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on rehearing granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 N.W.2d 499, 471 Mich. 876, 2004 Mich. LEXIS 2427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenk-boncher-prasher-v-vanderlaan-mich-2004.