Schenfeld v. Lawlor

New York Court of Appeals

Schenfeld v. Lawlor

123 N.E.2d 569, 307 N.Y. 916, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1599

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 3, 1954

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 N.E.2d 569 (Schenfeld v. Lawlor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenfeld v. Lawlor, 123 N.E.2d 569, 307 N.Y. 916, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1599 (N.Y. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of permission by the Appellate Division to appeal upon one or more certified questions, this appeal must be dismissed, since the order appealed from is not one for a new hearing in place of an old hearing, but directs a hearing to be had for the first time (Oiv. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 3; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 283-284).

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur; Van Voorhis, J., taking no part.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI