Schenck v. Vannest
4 N.J.L. 329
This text of 4 N.J.L. 329 (Schenck v. Vannest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schenck v. Vannest, 4 N.J.L. 329 (N.J. 1816).
Opinion
No rent was actually due. Pat. 164-The quarter had not expired. The sheriff was not bound to pay any thing to the landlord,
Nix. Dig. 490, $ 4. See also Central Bank vs. Peterson, 4 Zab. 668. Kirkpatrick vs. Cason, 1 Vr. 331. Ayers vs. Johnson, 2 Hal. 119. Peacock vs. Hammitt, 3 Gr. 165.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 N.J.L. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenck-v-vannest-nj-1816.