Schenck v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schenck v. City of New York

263 A.D. 901, 32 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7281

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 901 (Schenck v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenck v. City of New York, 263 A.D. 901, 32 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7281 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when she stepped into a hole in a public highway, judgment dismissing the complaint at the end of plaintiff’s ease reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Although plaintiff and her brother were confused in locating on the photographs in evidence the hole into which she fell, by description she, her brother, and her sister agreed as to the location, and the brother finally located the place on the photograph, which was in accord with the described location. Plaintiff made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when she stepped into a hole in a public highway, judgment dismissing the complaint at the end of plaintiff’s ease reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Although plaintiff and her brother were confused in locating on the photographs in evidence the hole into which she fell, by description she, her brother, and her sister agreed as to the location, and the brother finally located the place on the photograph, which was in accord with the described location. Plaintiff made out a prima facie case for submission to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 901, 32 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenck-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1942.