Schenck v. Behgler

New York Court of Appeals

Schenck v. Behgler

1 Silv. Ct. App. 385, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 856

DecidedMarch 25, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Silv. Ct. App. 385 (Schenck v. Behgler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schenck v. Behgler, 1 Silv. Ct. App. 385, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 856 (N.Y. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

The default herein was regularly taken, and the counsel for defendants asks to have it opened and [387]*387the case restored. We have looked into the return upon which the case would have to be argued in this court. It is very brief, and not an exception in it worthy of a moment’s consideration. The question as to the verdict being excessive cannot be reviewed here. Under these circumstances, the motion to open the default should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

The default herein was regularly taken, and the counsel for defendants asks to have it opened and [387]*387the case restored. We have looked into the return upon which the case would have to be argued in this court. It is very brief, and not an exception in it worthy of a moment’s consideration. The question as to the verdict being excessive cannot be reviewed here. Under these circumstances, the motion to open the default should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Silv. Ct. App. 385, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schenck-v-behgler-ny-1887.