Schemerhorn v. Jenkins

7 Johns. 373
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 7 Johns. 373 (Schemerhorn v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schemerhorn v. Jenkins, 7 Johns. 373 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The infancy of the plaintiff was not a proper ground of nonsuit at the trial. The defendant should have pleaded that matter in abatement. (1 Chitty on Pleadings, 436.) Such an appearance is cured after verdict, by the statute of jeofails. The defendant, by pleading in chief, admitted the due appearance of the plaintiff, [374]*374and joined issue upon the merits. The plaintiff at the trial could not have been nonsuited, but for want of proof to support the issue on his part. And though error is here brought upon a judgment of nonsuit, yet as it must have been attended with costs against the plaintiff, error will lie, according to the case of Smith v. Sutts. (2 Johns. Rep. 9.)

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Groat v. Tompkins Bus Corp.
142 Misc. 528 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1932)
McMullin v. McMullin
42 A. 499 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)
Hoskins v. White
32 P. 163 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)
Strong v. Jenkins
15 N.Y.S. 120 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1891)
Strong v. Jenkins
39 N.Y. St. Rep. 409 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1891)
In re Estate of Cahill
15 P. 364 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
In re Watson
2 Dem. Sur. 642 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1884)
Moran v. McLarty
18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 66 (New York Supreme Court, 1877)
Jaha v. Belleg
105 Mass. 208 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)
Croghan v. Livingston
6 Abb. Pr. 350 (New York Court of Appeals, 1858)
Hollingsworth v. State ex rel. Harvey
8 Ind. 257 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1856)
Wilkiming ex rel. Randa v. Schmale
1 Hilt. 263 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1856)
Gully v. Dunlap
24 Miss. 410 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 1852)
Ex parte Scott
1 Cow. 33 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Johns. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schemerhorn-v-jenkins-nysupct-1811.