Schembre v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schembre v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital

239 S.W.3d 123, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2007

DocketED 88414

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 S.W.3d 123 (Schembre v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schembre v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital, 239 S.W.3d 123, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thelma Schembre, Bobby J. Schembre, Laurie V. Laiben, Rebecca M. McNair, and Frank Schembre, Jr. (collectively referred to herein as “plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment in favor of Jefferson Memorial Hospital and Christopher Guelbert, R.N. (collectively referred to herein as “defendants”). Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred in striking affidavits and testimony of jurors at the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. Plaintiffs also argue that the trial court erroneously allowed the jury to be informed that a previous defendant, Mid-America Transplant Service (“MTS”) had been dismissed. In addition, plaintiffs argue the trial court erroneously responded to a question posed by the jury during deliberations. Finally, plaintiffs *124 claim the court erred in allowing defendants to argue their motion to dismiss without proper notice to plaintiffs.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thelma Schembre, Bobby J. Schembre, Laurie V. Laiben, Rebecca M. McNair, and Frank Schembre, Jr. (collectively referred to herein as “plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment in favor of Jefferson Memorial Hospital and Christopher Guelbert, R.N. (collectively referred to herein as “defendants”). Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred in striking affidavits and testimony of jurors at the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for new trial. Plaintiffs also argue that the trial court erroneously allowed the jury to be informed that a previous defendant, Mid-America Transplant Service (“MTS”) had been dismissed. In addition, plaintiffs argue the trial court erroneously responded to a question posed by the jury during deliberations. Finally, plaintiffs *124 claim the court erred in allowing defendants to argue their motion to dismiss without proper notice to plaintiffs.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 S.W.3d 123, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schembre-v-jefferson-memorial-hospital-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack