Scheltes v. Hunter

Appellate Court of Illinois

Scheltes v. Hunter

195 Ill. App. 213

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 15, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,836

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 Ill. App. 213 (Scheltes v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheltes v. Hunter, 195 Ill. App. 213 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assignments fob benefit of creditors, § 32*—when evidence sufficient to show valid assignment. In a replevin suit to recover property alleged to have been assigned for the benefit of creditors, evidence examined and held sufficient to show that the assignment had been made with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant in replevin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assignments fob benefit of creditors, § 32*—when evidence sufficient to show valid assignment. In a replevin suit to recover property alleged to have been assigned for the benefit of creditors, evidence examined and held sufficient to show that the assignment had been made with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant in replevin.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheltes-v-hunter-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack