Scheltes v. Hunter

Appellate Court of Illinois

Scheltes v. Hunter

195 Ill. App. 213

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 15, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assignments fob benefit of creditors, § 32*—when evidence sufficient to show valid assignment. In a replevin suit to recover property alleged to have been assigned for the benefit of creditors, evidence examined and held sufficient to show that the assignment had been made with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant in replevin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Assignments fob benefit of creditors, § 32*—when evidence sufficient to show valid assignment. In a replevin suit to recover property alleged to have been assigned for the benefit of creditors, evidence examined and held sufficient to show that the assignment had been made with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant in replevin.

Scheltes v. Hunter, 195 Ill. App. 213 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

195 Ill. App. 213 (Scheltes v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related