Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP
788 N.W.2d 441, 488 Mich. 871
Opinion
Shelly SCHELLENBERG and David Riggle, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
BINGHAM TOWNSHIP, Respondent-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, *442 and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP, 788 N.W.2d 441, 488 Mich. 871 (Mich. 2010).
788 N.W.2d 441 (Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.