Schell v. Rollins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schell v. Rollins

254 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 338, 2008 WL 708420

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 2008

DocketED 89756

StatusPublished

This text of 254 S.W.3d 104 (Schell v. Rollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schell v. Rollins, 254 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 338, 2008 WL 708420 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Rollins, Mark Stallion, Press McDowell, Mike Whittaker, John Hibbler, Loyse Clay, Charlet Clay, and First Missionary Baptist Church of Ballwin, a/k/a First Baptist Church of Ballwin (collectively referred to herein as “defendants”), appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Ernest Schell, Shirley Schell, and numerous other parties (collectively referred to herein as “plaintiffs”). The court ordered Richard Rollins (“Rollins”) to reimburse the First Missionary Baptist Church of Ballwin, a/k/a First Baptist Church of Ballwin (“the Church”) $107,826.10. The court also ordered the *105 remaining defendants to pay costs totaling $19,456.76. Defendants argue the court was without equitable jurisdiction to enter judgment on plaintiffs’ action for an accounting, and the judgment against Rollins was against the weight of the evidence. Defendants also claim the trial court erred entering judgment against defendants for costs.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Rollins, Mark Stallion, Press McDowell, Mike Whittaker, John Hibbler, Loyse Clay, Charlet Clay, and First Missionary Baptist Church of Ballwin, a/k/a First Baptist Church of Ballwin (collectively referred to herein as “defendants”), appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Ernest Schell, Shirley Schell, and numerous other parties (collectively referred to herein as “plaintiffs”). The court ordered Richard Rollins (“Rollins”) to reimburse the First Missionary Baptist Church of Ballwin, a/k/a First Baptist Church of Ballwin (“the Church”) $107,826.10. The court also ordered the *105 remaining defendants to pay costs totaling $19,456.76. Defendants argue the court was without equitable jurisdiction to enter judgment on plaintiffs’ action for an accounting, and the judgment against Rollins was against the weight of the evidence. Defendants also claim the trial court erred entering judgment against defendants for costs.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 S.W.3d 104, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 338, 2008 WL 708420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schell-v-rollins-moctapp-2008.