Schell v. Rall

223 A.D. 793

This text of 223 A.D. 793 (Schell v. Rall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schell v. Rall, 223 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Order modifying notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate notice of examination before trial granted, with ten dollars costs. Upon the facts here presented, we are of opinion that the examination before trial should not have been granted. (Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 1, 144 App. Div. 587; Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 2, Id. 589; Gullette v. Field, 96 Misc. 81; affd., 175 App. Div. 927; Goldberg v. Goldberg, 184 id. 949.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wessel v. Schwarzler
144 A.D. 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Gullette v. Field
175 A.D. 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Gullette v. Field
96 Misc. 81 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schell-v-rall-nyappdiv-1928.