Schelinski v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schelinski v. Evans

259 A.D. 1052, 22 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7934

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1052 (Schelinski v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schelinski v. Evans, 259 A.D. 1052, 22 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to vacate portions of the judgment, etc., and granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to enter final judgment pursuant to the interlocutory provisions of the judgment, etc., modified by striking out the first two decretal paragraphs and substituting in place thereof a paragraph stating that defendants’ motion is in all respects denied. The order is further modified by adding a statement to the third decretal paragraph that item “2 ” in plaintiff’s notice of motion is granted. As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p, 1117.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to vacate portions of the judgment, etc., and granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to enter final judgment pursuant to the interlocutory provisions of the judgment, etc., modified by striking out the first two decretal paragraphs and substituting in place thereof a paragraph stating that defendants’ motion is in all respects denied. The order is further modified by adding a statement to the third decretal paragraph that item “2 ” in plaintiff’s notice of motion is granted. As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p, 1117.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1052, 22 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schelinski-v-evans-nyappdiv-1940.