Schelhorn v. Westcott Express Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schelhorn v. Westcott Express Co.

181 A.D. 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 898 (Schelhorn v. Westcott Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schelhorn v. Westcott Express Co., 181 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question whether the emergency employment had not terminated, so that the plaintiff and the chauffeur were no longer fellow-servants, was a question of fact for the jury. Jenks, P. J., Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., concurred, and is also of opinion that the question of emergency servant is not present in' the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question whether the emergency employment had not terminated, so that the plaintiff and the chauffeur were no longer fellow-servants, was a question of fact for the jury. Jenks, P. J., Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., concurred, and is also of opinion that the question of emergency servant is not present in' the case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schelhorn-v-westcott-express-co-nyappdiv-1917.