Scheinholtz v. Platt

127 N.Y.S. 313
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 9, 1911·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before this court upon an agreed statement of facts, signed by the attorneys for the respective parties herein. This statement, however, is not accompanied by an affidavit, made by one of the parties, in compliance with section 241 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580), and the court was therefore without jurisdiction to render a judgment. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627, 97 N. Y. Supp. 396; Pollock v. Platt, 49 Misc. Rep. 635, 97 N. Y. Supp. 990; Herz v. Illinois Surety Co., 123 N. Y. Supp. 808.

Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scheinholtz v. Platt, 127 N.Y.S. 313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

127 N.Y.S. 313 (Scheinholtz v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store
49 Misc. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Pollock v. Platt
49 Misc. 635 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Herz v. Illinois Surety Co.
123 N.Y.S. 808 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)