Scheinholtz v. Platt
This text of 127 N.Y.S. 313 (Scheinholtz v. Platt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case comes before this court upon an agreed statement of facts, signed by the attorneys for the respective parties herein. This statement, however, is not accompanied by an affidavit, made by one of the parties, in compliance with section 241 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580), and the court was therefore without jurisdiction to render a judgment. Lax v. Fourteenth Street Store, 49 Misc. Rep. 627, 97 N. Y. Supp. 396; Pollock v. Platt, 49 Misc. Rep. 635, 97 N. Y. Supp. 990; Herz v. Illinois Surety Co., 123 N. Y. Supp. 808.
Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 N.Y.S. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheinholtz-v-platt-nyappterm-1911.