Scheinesohn v. Lemonek

Ohio Circuit Courts

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 727

DecidedJuly 3, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 727 (Scheinesohn v. Lemonek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek, 22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 727 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, J.

The record does not show that the charge complained of was all that was said to the jury by the court upon the subject in litigation. For aught that appears the errors claimed to exist may have been corrected.

However; the court is of the opinion that in the charge, in its entirety, there is nothing prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment is affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, J.

The record does not show that the charge complained of was all that was said to the jury by the court upon the subject in litigation. For aught that appears the errors claimed to exist may have been corrected.

However; the court is of the opinion that in the charge, in its entirety, there is nothing prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment is affirmed.

Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheinesohn-v-lemonek-ohiocirct-1909.