Scheinesohn v. Lemonek

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 266
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided July 3, 1909·Published

Opinion

The record does not show that the charge complained of was all that was said to the jury by the court upon the subject in litigation. For aught that appears the errors claimed to exist may have been corrected.

However, the, court is of the opinion that in the charge, in its entirety, there is nothing prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scheinesohn v. Lemonek, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 266 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278 (Scheinesohn v. Lemonek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.