Scheinesohn v. Lemonek
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 266
This text of 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278 (Scheinesohn v. Lemonek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scheinesohn v. Lemonek, 12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 266 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).
Opinion
The record does not show that the charge complained of was all that was said to the jury by the court upon the subject in litigation. For aught that appears the errors claimed to exist may have been corrected.
However, the, court is of the opinion that in the charge, in its entirety, there is nothing prejudicial to plaintiff in error and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 278, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheinesohn-v-lemonek-ohcircthamilton-1909.