Scheinberg v. Scheinberg

166 N.E. 315, 250 N.Y. 538, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 917
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.E. 315 (Scheinberg v. Scheinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheinberg v. Scheinberg, 166 N.E. 315, 250 N.Y. 538, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 917 (N.Y. 1929).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 249 N. Y. 277.)

Motion for restitution granted, with ten dollars costs of motion.

Recall of remittitur requested, and when recalled ordered that it be amended by adding thereto the following: “ A motion having been made for an order herein directing and compelling restitution to defendant Beatrice Scheinberg of the title to premises now recorded in the name of Scheinberg Estates, Inc., a corporation owned and controlled by the plaintiffs herein, Ordered that said motion be and it is hereby granted and that plaintiffs cause their nominee Scheinberg Estates, Inc., to execute and deliver to defendant Beatrice Scheinberg a deed of conveyance in usual form, duly acknowledged for recording, of the premises described in the deed from Beatrice Scheinberg to Scheinberg Estates, Inc., being the premises described in the complaint herein, said premises to be held by her subject to the further order of the court herein, and that it be remitted to the Supreme Court to make such orders and issue such process or mandates as may be necessary and appropriate to effect the restitution herein ordered.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scheinberg v. Scheinberg
164 N.E. 98 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.E. 315, 250 N.Y. 538, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheinberg-v-scheinberg-ny-1929.