Scheifer v. Kahlman
30 Mo. 232
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case comes here for a refusal of a continuance. In this respect it is like the case of Garnier v. LeBeau et al., decided at this term of the court. The judgment will be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages ; Judge Ewing concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scheifer v. Kahlman, 30 Mo. 232 (Mo. 1860).
30 Mo. 232 (Scheifer v. Kahlman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.