Scheier v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Scheier v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 2, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (Scheier v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheier v. Metropolitan El. R. Co., 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should he modified by requiring the plaintiff, at the time of the delivery of her deed as in said judgment provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the holder of the two mortgages found by the referee to exist upon the premises pursuant to the sixty-fourth request of the defendants at page 45 of the case, and as thus modified it should be affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should he modified by requiring the plaintiff, at the time of the delivery of her deed as in said judgment provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the holder of the two mortgages found by the referee to exist upon the premises pursuant to the sixty-fourth request of the defendants at page 45 of the case, and as thus modified it should be affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheier-v-metropolitan-el-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.