Scheib v. Rozberil

Supreme Court

Scheib v. Rozberil

140 S. Ct. 286, 205 L. Ed. 2d 6

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 7, 2019

DocketNo. 18-9287

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 S. Ct. 286 (Scheib v. Rozberil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheib v. Rozberil, 140 S. Ct. 286, 205 L. Ed. 2d 6 (U.S. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for *287a writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for *287a writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S. Ct. 286, 205 L. Ed. 2d 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheib-v-rozberil-scotus-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack