Scheib v. Curran
678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 968, 655 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4825
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af[970] firmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division’s conclusions that the corporation evaded service and that plaintiffs counsel’s attempts to serve process were reasonable and diligent find support in the record.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scheib v. Curran, 678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 968, 655 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4825 (N.Y. 1997).
678 N.E.2d 497 (Scheib v. Curran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rahhal v. Downing
2018 NY Slip Op 73 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)