Scheib v. Curran

New York Court of Appeals

Scheib v. Curran

678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 968, 655 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4825

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 678 N.E.2d 497 (Scheib v. Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scheib v. Curran, 678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 968, 655 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4825 (N.Y. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af[970]*970firmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division’s conclusions that the corporation evaded service and that plaintiffs counsel’s attempts to serve process were reasonable and diligent find support in the record.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af[970]*970firmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division’s conclusions that the corporation evaded service and that plaintiffs counsel’s attempts to serve process were reasonable and diligent find support in the record.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 968, 655 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheib-v-curran-ny-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack