Schehen v. Palmateer

66 P.3d 540, 187 Or. App. 104, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 396
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 20, 2003
Docket00C-16025; A115839
StatusPublished

This text of 66 P.3d 540 (Schehen v. Palmateer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schehen v. Palmateer, 66 P.3d 540, 187 Or. App. 104, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 396 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Smart v. Maass, 148 Or App 431, 435, 939 P2d 1184, rev den, 326 Or 62 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smart v. Maass
939 P.2d 1184 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 P.3d 540, 187 Or. App. 104, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schehen-v-palmateer-orctapp-2003.