Schefrin v. Wilensky

114 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 705, 7 Stock. 705, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 259
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 114 A. 927 (Schefrin v. Wilensky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schefrin v. Wilensky, 114 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 705, 7 Stock. 705, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 109.

For affirmance—The Ci-iie,e-Justice, Swayzb, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Tyalisch, Black, PIeppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner—10. For reversal—Parker, Katzenbacii, White—3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A. 927, 92 N.J. Eq. 705, 7 Stock. 705, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schefrin-v-wilensky-nj-1921.