Scheffel, Et Vir v. Dade County

194 So. 631, 142 Fla. 224
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 631 (Scheffel, Et Vir v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheffel, Et Vir v. Dade County, 194 So. 631, 142 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Chapman are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 631, 142 Fla. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheffel-et-vir-v-dade-county-fla-1940.