Schefe v. St. Louis

194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 16, 1904
Docket62
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 194 U.S. 373 (Schefe v. St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schefe v. St. Louis, 194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652 (1904).

Opinion

194 U.S. 373 (1904)

SCHEFE
v.
ST. LOUIS.

No. 62.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 12, 1904.
Decided May 16, 1904.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI.

Mr. G.N. Fickeissen, with whom Mr. J.D. Johnson was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William F. Woerner, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bates and Mr. C.R. Skinker were on the brief, for defendant in error.[1]

This case is similar to Fischer v. St. Louis, ante, p. 361, in every material particular, and, for the reasons stated in that case, is also

Affirmed.

NOTES

[1] For abstract of arguments, see ante, p. 363.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Kaye
11 Alaska 556 (D. Alaska, 1948)
Kramer v. Baltimore
171 A. 70 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)
Ex Parte Higgins v. Hoctor
62 S.W.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schefe-v-st-louis-scotus-1904.