Schefe v. St. Louis
This text of 194 U.S. 373 (Schefe v. St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCHEFE
v.
ST. LOUIS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. G.N. Fickeissen, with whom Mr. J.D. Johnson was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. William F. Woerner, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bates and Mr. C.R. Skinker were on the brief, for defendant in error.[1]
This case is similar to Fischer v. St. Louis, ante, p. 361, in every material particular, and, for the reasons stated in that case, is also
Affirmed.
NOTES
[1] For abstract of arguments, see ante, p. 363.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schefe-v-st-louis-scotus-1904.