Schefe v. St. Louis
194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652
Opinion
SCHEFE
v.
ST. LOUIS.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. G.N. Fickeissen, with whom Mr. J.D. Johnson was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. William F. Woerner, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bates and Mr. C.R. Skinker were on the brief, for defendant in error.[1]
This case is similar to Fischer v. St. Louis, ante, p. 361, in every material particular, and, for the reasons stated in that case, is also
Affirmed.
NOTES
[1] For abstract of arguments, see ante, p. 363.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schefe v. St. Louis, 194 U.S. 373, 48 L. Ed. 1024, 24 S. Ct. 676, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 652 (1904).
194 U.S. 373 (Schefe v. St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Kaye
11 Alaska 556 (D. Alaska, 1948)
Kramer v. Baltimore
171 A. 70 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)
Ex Parte Higgins v. Hoctor
62 S.W.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)